Ayers Case Now In Hands of 5th Circuit
©2003. The Jackson Advocate, Jackson,
Mississippi. Posted by permission.
Boosted by a rally of black students, educators and civil
rights activists gathered in New Orleans Monday from across the nation,
Attorney Alvin O. Chambliss, Jr., presented the long-anticipated appeal of the
Ayers settlement that was purportedly made to compensate black students and
Mississippi’s three historically black colleges for over a century of
neglect and racial discrimination.
“Attorney Alvin Chambliss presented a powerful case for
upholding the original intent of the Jake Ayers lawsuit against Mississippi
and its institutions of higher education,” says Paula Powell, national
spokesperson for the National Association of African American Students.
“We’re waiting for Mississippi to decide now whether it will live up to
its obligations to the black citizens and students resident there.”
Chambliss and a team of highly-motivated lawyers presented
the case seeking to rework and expand the $503 million settlement that the
original plaintiffs in the case rejected, although a revisionist of group
plaintiffs headed by U. S. Congressman Bennie Thompson accepted it. Chambliss
had been the attorney for the Ayers plaintiffs for more than 25 years, but was
ushered out of the case by North Mississippi Legal Services shortly before the
settlement was laid before U. S. District Court Judge Neal Biggers. Jackson
Attorney Isaac Byrd, who was in New Orleans as a member of the opposing team,
had replaced Chambliss in the final months of the original lawsuit.
“The issue is whether the Court will see fit to offer
relief to the appellants in this case,” Chambliss says. “What we asked for
won’t cost the state of Mississippi one cent in the initial stage. Our
concern is that the original plan of offering black students equal educational
opportunity, as was stated under Plessy versus Ferguson in 1896, and equal
access to all levels of professional preparation, which was included in the
spirit of Brown versus Board of Education in 1954 and 1955, be put in
place.”
One of the great ironies of the Ayers agreement is the
adverse effect it has had on improving education for black students,
particularly in the entering freshman classes since 1975. Black freshman
enrollment is down more than 56 percent at the state’s three predominantly
black institutions ---Alcorn State University, Jackson State and Mississippi
Valley University. Black freshman enrollment today is down by more than 31
percent in all the state’s colleges, including the five major white
campuses.
One of the most disturbing provisions of the Ayers agreement
is the set aside of $246 million, more than 45 percent of the settlement
money, for black colleges to attract white students to their campuses. Some
critics view this as punishing black colleges and students for the long
neglect of the state, which deliberately made the black institutions
unattractive to serious students of whatever color.
Educational researchers have determined that for equal
access to exist today, there should 2500 blacker freshman entering the black
schools each year. And the projection is for 10,000 more black students
overall in the white sector. Equal access to higher education would indicate
at least 26,000 black students in the entire system. Today, there are only
16,000.
Even the Ayers agreement signed on to by the State of
Mississippi acknowledged that the state and the traditionally white
institutions of higher learning were culpable in the denial of equal education
to black students. The Notice of the Proposed Settlement of Class Action
Involving Mississippi’s Public Universities was addressed to: “All black
citizens residing in Mississippi, whether students, former students, parents,
employees or taxpayers, who have been, are, or will be discriminated against
on account of race in receiving equal educational opportunity and/or equal
opportunity in the universities operated by the Board of Trustees of State
Instructions of Higher Learning.”
The State also recognized its own fault and the general
culpability of its white colleges in the denial of the rights of Black
Mississippians. The introduction to the Settlement Agreement reads as follows:
“The Agreement is made by Bennie G. Thompson, on behalf of
himself and the class of persons identified below (collectively the Class),
the United States of America, the Governor of the State of Mississippi in his
official capacity, and the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher
Learning (‘The Board’). The Board enters into this Agreement on behalf of
itself and the following other defendants in this proceeding: Delta State
University, Mississippi State University, Mississippi University for Women,
the University of Mississippi, and the University of Southern Mississippi;
and, in their official capacities, the institutional executives of such
universities, the Commissioner of Higher Education, and the individual members
of the Board.”
Faced by a number of almost insurmountable problems
---missing court records, a tight timeline, and inadequate funds to carry out
the necessary preparation--- Chambliss attributes his success to divine
intervention.
“Three angels descended from heaven and helped to work a
miracle in getting this case ready for presentation on time,” Chambliss
says. “He introduced three members of his legal team ---Destiny Allen of
Portland, Oregon; Linda Dunson of Huntsville, TX; and Eric McFerer of
Memphis--- to the court as his “Angels.”
“They gave up their jobs and left their families to come
and set up a round-the-clock work session for 30 days. And we were able to get
our work in order to present to the Court.”
The two other members of Chambliss’ team of lawyers
included James M. Douglass, den emeritus of the Thurgood Marshall School of
Law, and Morris L. Overstreet, former justice of the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals, the equivalent of Mississippi’s Supreme court. Overstreet is the
only black justice to have served at such a high level in the Texas court
system.
The three-judge panel sitting on the Fifth Circuit Court
allowed 30 minutes each to Chambliss and to the attorney representing the
state of Mississippi.
Presenting the case before the justices was not the problem
for Chambliss and his team. They were confronted with an incredibly long delay
in obtaining the court records. Then the lead attorney, working alone at
first, was then hit with a strict deadline. In reconstituting the misplaced
records, court officials tended to include some materials that were not part
of the case, causing additional headaches for the greatly understaffed Ayers
team. Working alone, Chambliss was plagued by the possibility of failing the
trusting widow of Jake Ayers and the 11 other appellants he has continued to
represent, despite being severed from the original case by his former
employers.
“If we had failed to present our briefs on time, despite
the massive amount of materials confronting us,” says Chambliss, “then the
result would have been the denial of the appeal.”
Dr. Alex Acholonu, Faculty Senate president at Alcorn, was
one of the several hundred sojourners attending the New Orleans rally in
support of the appeal team.
“We were joined by a very good number of people from many
different areas,” says Acholonu. “I thought that Mr. Chambliss
presentation was just excellent. I found the entire event very impressive and
very favorable to our cause.”
It’s a very complex case,” says Powell, who works at the
University of California, Santa Cruz. “But I hope the State of Mississippi
would see these (black colleges) as American public institutions. And when we
make these schools what they should be, then it’s a win-win situation for
everyone.”
Chambliss and his team argued on the basis of guarantees of
the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, along with rights covered under Title VI
of the Civil Rights Bill of 1964.
Chambliss is determined to see the case through to its final
resolution.
“We’re going all the way as long as Mrs. Ayers and the
11 plaintiffs say they want relief.”
The court decision may come in anywhere between two weeks to
30 or even 90 days, depending on how much discussion and dissent
crops during the deliberations.
[INDEX
PAGE]